Not terribly scientific, but ...#506864 By Chris - Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:01 pm - Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:01 pm #506864 Pageviews for Chris leaving vs Chris starting: @c_hri_s@chrismoylesnet
Re: Not terribly scientific, but ...#506869 By DevilsDuck - Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:00 am - Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:00 am #506869 Whats the scale? because if the top line is 2...then its not great! Send me the answer to question 1!P. S. Don't argue with Topher or Zoot
Re: Not terribly scientific, but ...#506876 By Nicola_Red - Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:24 am - Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:24 am #506876 If only we'd sent a welcome book and they'd read our names out! Oh well Bas wrote:She's the Tina Daheley of chrismoyles.netMissed any of Dave's Tedious Links? Catch up with my Tedious Links 2010-12 page here
Re: Not terribly scientific, but ...#506922 By Chris - Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:58 pm - Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:58 pm #506922 DevilsDuck wrote:Whats the scale? because if the top line is 2...then its not great! It started with a 2.200,000. @c_hri_s@chrismoylesnet
Re: Not terribly scientific, but ...#506935 By DevilsDuck - Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:48 am - Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:48 am #506935 Send me the answer to question 1!P. S. Don't argue with Topher or Zoot
chrismoyles.net
- By Sidders
