bumheed7 wrote:bigearz wrote:chris was great! the show was for charidee not to find the next big talent, matt and lisa good singers personality of wood! still c'est la vie!
is it bollocks. the shows to line the pockets of those on it. moyles was reportadly getting 100k and if he wasnt, hed be getting close to it. judges will be on healthy packets as well as thornton. thats why i think sharon is a total hypocrite for saying loos was there for 'her own charity'. so was she!
so to say its for charity is pish as 1/5 (10p) of each vote goes to charity. shocking, given the amount of times they mentioned charity!
100k was a 'reported' amount, ie reported by someone who couldn't be arsed to follow through a story.
It's highly unlikely he was paid that amount of money, altough he was probably getting a little more than others. But deservedly so considering the no-marks he was up against.
I agree that Sharon Osbourne is a hypocrite, a self centered woman who is willing to exploite her own family yet frowns upon a nanny who had sex with an employer who was also married.
chrismoyles.net
