The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
By MC
#229508
From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5003642.stm:

BBC Entertainment Online wrote:A media think tank has called for the BBC to sell off Radio 1 and 2 "as soon as possible".

The BBC's annual radio budget of £450m had severely limited growth in the commercial radio sector, the European Media Forum (EMF) report said.

As the two rely mainly on music they have a limited public service role - a factor which strengthens the case for privatisation, it added.

The EMF estimated the BBC could raise more than £500m through a sell off.

"Our argument is that whereas you can put forward a pretty compelling case for a public sector role for Radios 4 and 3 - and also Radio 5, it gets a bit thin when you look at Radios 1 and 2 - and they could survive quite easily in the private sector," said the report's author, economist Keith Boyfield.

The report argued that the UK radio sector was suffering from "stunted growth", and the problem had been intensified by the BBC's ability to cross promote and cross subsidise across a number of media platforms. The EMF also argued that Radios 1 and 2 would fare well in the commercial sector as the stations currently attract the highest radio audiences in the UK.

"If both Radio 1 and 2 were sold in a combined sale the proceeds might arguably total £500m or more," it added.

But the BBC said both radio stations offered diverse music, documentaries and current affairs shows that could not be found in the commercial sector.

It said the stations provided innovative and challenging content that the market would not otherwise provide.

Kelvin MacKenzie, former chief executive of the Wireless Group which controls a number of UK local radio stations, welcomed the EMF's privatisation call as a "splendid idea".

The wide availability of commercial music on radio, the internet and through downloads meant that the two stations could no longer lay claim to offering a public service as set out in the BBC's remit, he said.

Commercial woes

"Why does the BBC want to hang onto basically what is, on Radio One, pop music, and on Radio 2, middle of the road music, when all they're really doing is bankrupting commercial forces?," he told Radio 4's Today programme.

Commercial radio is currently going through a "nightmare" which is made worse by the fact that the BBC has a 60% share of the radio audience, Mr MacKenzie said.

"Why should advertisers go to commercial radio when they're missing 60% of the audience?" he added.

The report came as Chrysalis - which owns the Heart and Galaxy brands - blamed a tough advertising market for a sharp 46% drop in full year profits to £2.1m.

Earlier this year, radio broadcaster GCap Media blamed falling audiences and short advert breaks for a 17% drop in revenues in the first three months of the year.
By handyandy88
#229548
No way should they sell Radio 1 and 2.

Imagine Moylesey saying "we'll have Pink and the news right after this short break" - no way.

Ok, it might be good for the funding for the wages, but then again they pay some of the staff, including the DJ's overpriced wages. Moyles is good - but he could have less of a wage.

If it is privatised, Radio 1 will be influenced by commercial crap and the BBC will lose its best new music station, and its older music station. The BBC need to keep them.

Andy
By David
#229568
It'll never happen!
User avatar
By fish heads
#229596
It's a rediculous argument. It's like saying BBC 1 and 2 should be sold off because similar shows can be found on Itv and Channel 4 whilst also hindering the development of similar channels on digital tv.

If common sense prevails, this will never happen.
User avatar
By Sidders
#229601
They have a point though. Surely selling Radio 1 & 2 would benefit the BBC? It must cost them quit a bit to keep them going, and I doubt they'd have to reduce the licence fee as they'd just claim that the money is being used elsewhere.

Having said that, I'd hate it to happen. If it does happen I'd rather have a seperate radio licence fee rather than have commercials.
By David
#229611
Radio 1 gets something like 40p of each persons licence fee. Surely it's not going to save that much for what they are going to loose.
By David
#229634
quit your jibber jabber
User avatar
By Adam
#229664
Hangbags!

Ignore it, it'll go away. I bet Digital Spy and Media UK are having a fu*king field day with this story.

Having said that - Mark "Director General of the BBC" Thompson gets his way, so you never know!
User avatar
By oliver
#229675
would it be a bad thing
would we see commercials on radio 1 if it did?
User avatar
By Adam
#229677
oliver wrote:would it be a bad thing


Yes.

oliver wrote:would we see commercials on radio 1 if it did?


Yes.
By David
#229685
And as a part of the BBC, Radio 1 has massive resources avaliable to them, which makes them so good.
User avatar
By Lucie
#229706
oliver wrote:would it be a bad thing
would we see commercials on radio 1 if it did?


Oliver!

How nice to see you again!

How are you?
User avatar
By Adam
#229707
He's only after your body, Lucie. And the show jingles of course.
User avatar
By Quincy
#229710
hi this is chris tarrant
User avatar
By Adam
#229718
........... and when im in the UK, I listen to Chris Moyles on Radio 1
By Fathomer
#229726
There was a plan in 1994 to privatise Radio 1 but it fell through.
The plan then was there wouldnt be any adverts but each show would be sponsered by a big name.
So The Chris Moyles Show with Orange....the Future's Bright!

Sat is up Thanks Ian