Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#390876
OK, I need peoples' input on this one. It's annoying me, so I hope my feelings are justified.

Basically, recently a local kid (and friend of my brother) was ridiculously drunk and was very regrettably hit by a truck as he wandered aimlessly on a dual carriageway, oblivious to the fact he was even on a road. Now, obviously this is a terrible tragedy but here's the part that gets me.

His funeral was today, so all his mates decided to go out and pissed after, to 'celebrate' his life. Now, it may be the norm but seeing as it was the sauce that claimed the poor kid's life is it wrong of me to think that these kids are idiots for getting seshed after their own mate's funeral?

Thanks.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#390877
Bonanzoid wrote:OK, I need peoples' input on this one. It's annoying me, so I hope my feelings are justified.

Basically, recently a local kid (and friend of my brother) was ridiculously drunk and was very regrettably hit by a truck as he wandered aimlessly on a dual carriageway, oblivious to the fact he was even on a road. Now, obviously this is a terrible tragedy but here's the part that gets me.

His funeral was today, so all his mates decided to go out and pissed after, to 'celebrate' his life. Now, it may be the norm but seeing as it was the sauce that claimed the poor kid's life is it wrong of me to think that these kids are idiots for getting seshed after their own mate's funeral?

Thanks.

I read about that on the BBC - it sounded pretty horrific. A mate of mine was killed when he drove his car into a motorway pillar while drunk. I think we pretty much did the same as your brother is doing after the funeral.

While I understand your point, your brother and his mates will want to do something that feels like the norm to them. They probably all got pissed together when he was alive and will say it's "what he would have wanted". They will need something to take the edge off what must have been a horrible day and maybe to try and forget about it a bit. Keep an eye on him over the next while though - don't let him keep getting drunk because of it.

As I say, I get what your point is, but I wouldn't say it to him.

I know he doesn't know who I am, but pass on my thoughts or summit.
User avatar
By Boboff
#390886
It was not the drink that killed him, it was walking home. Far safer in a car.

Everyone I think knows someone like this, in the village here a chap raced up the hill on new years day and killed himself, tragic, but his mates still go round bombing around the village and lanes, it won't be long before they kill a drunk pedestrian around here!
User avatar
By jocky85
#390896
foot-loose wrote:
jocky85 wrote:A certain guy, every single time I'm ok again, he appears back in my life - how does he know?????

Can I chop his baws off for ya?


Be my guest!!

All I have to say about him is he needs to learn that sometimes a little honesty can go a long way - no matter what it is you're going to say!!
User avatar
By MK Chris
#390901
Ed Pummelon wrote:Predictably, the Daily Mail. Arseholes.

Nothing to do with the vote - and purely speculation, which perhaps makes me almost as bad as them (but at least I'm making it clear I'm speculating) - interesting article in the Press Gazette about one of the guys who helped get the MPs expenses into the media. The most interesting bit is when they were they talk about difficulties in getting newspapers to accept their terms:
"Nobody declined it. Everybody was keen to have it but they wanted it on their own terms and that was unacceptable to the whistleblower and it was unacceptable to me.

"One of the prime conditions was that whichever newspaper did get the exclusive had to be willing to cover every MP who misbehaved from whatever party.

"There is at least one newspaper who wanted to use it to destroy one party," he said, but would not name it.

Now for the speculation... I'm going to confidently proclaim it was either the Mail or the Express. Or both.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#390909
Also annoying are the stupid people in Milton Keynes who seem to think this is still 1929 and are hellbent on a manhunt. Yes, there is a dangerous rapist on the loose who needs to be caught. No, vigilantism is not the way to deal with him.
User avatar
By Yudster
#390910
Well, its what they'd do in Eastenders you see - and of course its always appropriate to look to soap operas for your social behaviour norms.
User avatar
By Zoot
#390915
Just popped to PC world, turned the radio on and Jo Whiley started a link after a song with the sentence 'OMG thats a great song...'
Is it common for people to actually use text speak during actual verbal conversation? I think the day I hear someone say 'LOL' out loud in mirth will be the day I die a little inside.
User avatar
By Yudster
#390916
And she's 43 years old for goodness sake. Thats almost as old as me. Its certainly plenty old enough to know better.........
User avatar
By jocky85
#390929
Yes confessing to listening to Scott Mills again - but he says it and an 'Oh Whats Occuring' feature once I think was how many times Ferne Cotton had said it. Jo Wiley though? Shocking
User avatar
By Zoot
#390931
Ed Pummelon wrote:You mean she actually said the letters "Oh Em Gee"?


Yea, exactly like that.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#390932
Zoot wrote:Just popped to PC world, turned the radio on and Jo Whiley started a link after a song with the sentence 'OMG thats a great song...'
Is it common for people to actually use text speak during actual verbal conversation? I think the day I hear someone say 'LOL' out loud in mirth will be the day I die a little inside.


E4 man (whose name escapes me at present) used it in an ad once to take the piss out of Big Brother USA last year:

American contestant in a whiney voice: Ooooooh Myyyyyyyyy Gooooooooood!

E4 Man: Yes OMG Girlfriend

It was rather funny as he was taking the piss, plus he's voice always makes me laught.

However Wiley should know better.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#390942
Normally I am quite defensive of Jo's show, but I can't bring myself to defend her in this instance.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#390979
Bonanzoid wrote:One of my friends in school 3 or so years back was laughing at literally said "lol". We disowned her.


Someone I know uses the term "meh" mid way through conversation "I just thought it was meh". What's wrong with the youth of today saying "I just thought it was bollocks" much better use of the English language ;)
User avatar
By Console
#390981
'Meh' is used to imply indifference, whereas saying something was 'bollocks' means that you thought it was bad. They're different terms used for different situations, which was why they used one over the other.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#390984
Console wrote:'Meh' is used to imply indifference, whereas saying something was 'bollocks' means that you thought it was bad. They're different terms used for different situations, which was why they used one over the other.


So in other words he said "I just thought it was indifference", see my statement makes more sense ;) :lol:
  • 1
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • 236
  • 237
  • 559

Small editing gap to come