Yudster wrote:Topher wrote:..........(there are far more humane ways of controlling numbers anyway); ...........
There aren't, actually. Shooting them is much less humane, you end up with wounded foxes staggering around the countryside and no-one wants that. Hunting them with dogs is the most efficient way to do it. There are some places where some kind of control is necessary because of numbers, but on the whole foxes are, as Andy says, far more of a problem in towns than in the country. Foxhunting is basically harmless sport (harmless in that it will have no effect on the viability of foxes as a species or the ecosystems they survive in). I can't imagine wanting to do it myself (I really only have any interest in killing things if I am going to eat them), but I don't have any issues with people who do.
Yudster wrote:I'm really not sure I can agree that foxhunting is "cruel". Being a wild animal isn't like Beatrix Potter stories - strange though it might seem, for most wild animals there are far worse ways to go than chased by dogs and killed quickly. As for them being traumatised - thats pure anthropomorphism, wild animals chase and kill each other all the time. If we hadn't killed all the large predators in this country (wild cats, wolves, bears, eagle owls etc) foxes would have this kind of thing happening to them every flippin day. Thats what its like to be a wild animal - not like in the picture books.
That being said, I still don't want to do it myself. I'd probably fall off my horse and get killed. Talk about kismet.
I am 100% against everything said here.
Wild animals killing each other to survive is totally different to a bunch of arseholes breeding hundreds of dogs, keeping them in shit conditions, then setting them loose on one animal with the sole intent of ripping it to shreds. * tradition as well, by the way.
Yes, shooting them is probably not so 'effective', but the point of the hunt is NOT population control - it's a blood sport and it is rediculous that there has even been a discussion on whither it should be allowed to continue.
Your argument that life is not like a beatrix potter book is fair enough, life is pretty shit I'm sure for them, but thats nature. It's manage fine up till now - you seem to be saying that having a pack of dogs rip you to bits is the lesser of two evils??
At least with sports such as deer hunting, there is a point to the kill - the animal gets eaten and I imagine most of the rest of the bits get used one way or another, but with a fox hunt - there is no reason to it.