Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Yudster
#482118
madz793 wrote:That's brilliant, people who don't know the difference between 'scratch' and 'itch' also annoy me.


YES!!!
User avatar
By chrysostom
#482129
charlalottie wrote:That's something new learned for today.


Is it learned or learnt? Or are both appropriate? (not being pedantic, I just don't know!)

I had this issue with dreamed and dreamt when I was listening to the Harry Potter audio books a few months ago, and with that I think either is fine.
User avatar
By chrysostom
#482133
Stephen Fry's voice is magical in the context of those books. His accents are quite good too, I've been listening to the Hunger Games and it's apparent how good he was - because the woman reading it was good, but nowhere near as engaging as Fry.

Also, this story about an elderly couple accidentally growing this giant cannabis plant has really tickled me (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-be ... s-19868327).

Image
User avatar
By Latina
#482134
chrysostom wrote:Stephen Fry's voice is magical in the context of those books. His accents are quite good too, I've been listening to the Hunger Games and it's apparent how good he was - because the woman reading it was good, but nowhere near as engaging as Fry.


It takes real skill to read and perform so many different characters so distinctly, and HP has over 100 apparently. I learned that in an interview with Jim Dale, who narrates the American version (which I've never heard).

Also, I always believed Stephen's Hermione to be way better than Emma Watson's and his was always the "real" one to me (although that may be more because of the way Hermione was written in the movies than how Emma portrayed her).
User avatar
By chrysostom
#482138
Yeah, I think that the Hermione of the books wasn't as attractive, and while her character would appeal to parents - I doubt it would appeal to young girls in quite the same way, as she was a bit of an anti social geek (who was annoyingly know-it-all) for the first few books. The film's Hermione is much more of an archetypal role model - there is a massive difference between the two, but probably a necessary one.
User avatar
By Latina
#482139
chrysostom wrote:The film's Hermione is much more of an archetypal role model - there is a massive difference between the two, but probably a necessary one.


I think this was at the expense of the character though - the films should have gone somewhere between the two. Emma's Hermione was too good at everything including things that shouldn't have come naturally to someone who didn't grow up in the wizarding world. Book Hermione did have some very admirable traits (which Harry didn't always appreciate), but unfortunately there was no time for them in the film so I suppose they went for the superwoman route instead.

Also I feel that her friendship with Harry was (after the 2nd film) elevated above Ron's friendship with Harry, to the point where she was seen as the female lead to Harry's male lead as opposed to one of two equal supporting characters alongside Ron. That annoyed me although I suppose - again - maybe the film-makers thought doing anything else would appear sexist and wouldn't work as well on screen these days.

Damn, for a while I forgot I was such a big HP fan...
User avatar
By The Deadly
#482147
Money saving expert Martin Lewis is filming his tv show at my work next week. Don't know why they chose to do it here but the publicity will be good.
Last edited by The Deadly on Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#482148
What TV show is that? He usually does snippets for other TV shows like Watchdog.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#482150
chrysostom wrote:Also, this story about an elderly couple accidentally growing this giant cannabis plant has really tickled me (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-be ... s-19868327).

Image


Jeez, she's a beauty! Thats gotta be a £10,000 bush!!
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#482276
Whoop! Off to Portugal later! Yeah!

Me = happy bunny.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#482287
A boy likes me, as in, not just wanting to get in my pants. I have been single for so long, I barely know how to process this information. But it's a good thing.
User avatar
By neilt0
#482292
Nicola_Red wrote:A boy likes me, as in, not just wanting to get in my pants. I have been single for so long, I barely know how to process this information. But it's a good thing.

When you say "boy", do you mean Harry Styles?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#482293
No. It's just a term I tend to use. But Harry Styles is probably rich enough that if it were him interested, I'd go with it.
User avatar
By a-moron
#482301
Nicola_Red wrote:A boy likes me, as in, not just wanting to get in my pants. I have been single for so long, I barely know how to process this information. But it's a good thing.


?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#482304
theflyingbadger wrote:
Nicola_Red wrote:A boy likes me, as in, not just wanting to get in my pants. I have been single for so long, I barely know how to process this information. But it's a good thing.


?


No! :)
User avatar
By daveG
#482340
Nicola_Red wrote:A boy likes me, as in, not just wanting to get in my pants. I have been single for so long, I barely know how to process this information. But it's a good thing.


he wants to get into your jumper, doesn't he?

sneaky devil
  • 1
  • 497
  • 498
  • 499
  • 500
  • 501
  • 632