Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#481525
theflyingbadger wrote:
Nicola_Red wrote:Fun fact: when I was moderator on another message board I banned someone for implying that another poster was a paedophile.


Oh FFS.

Ban me then.


I'm not gonna ban you, because a) it's not against the rules of this board and b) in the other example the person saying that had malicious intentions. I think you just sometimes post without considering the implications of what you're saying.
User avatar
By a-moron
#481535
chrysostom wrote:Image


^ I like it but have no idea what the * it means. ^

Re: The whole Paedophilia / Implications post.

I mean wow. Just wow. Took a few minutes to take in cause I've just done my usual and posted without thinking.
You know, like the class clown. The smart arse.
The one with the quick quip to make some of the kids laugh and get some little kick from it.

But my grooming post was meant. I did mean to set you up. I knew how you'd react and then I would reply with the tending to the hair line. Implications never came into it at any point as any rational person would realise that I person posting (me) was doing so in jest.

Not accusing someone of * Paedophilia.

With that I bid you adieu for the day.
Can't be * with any of this nonsense today.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#481538
theflyingbadger wrote:Re: The whole Paedophilia / Implications post.

Implications never came into it at any point as any rational person would realise that I person posting (me) was doing so in jest.

Not accusing someone of * Paedophilia.


I know you weren't. I'd still rather you just didn't say it! I don't think that's an unreasonable request at all.
User avatar
By Yudster
#481544
None of this is making me smile or laugh today.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#481550
I know. I was happy I had someone nice to talk to, and before I knew it had become an argument about paedophilia...
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#481557
Saying "but it's just a joke" isn't enough to justify saying anything you like. I wasn't happy with him saying that and I politely said so. He's the one that's stropped off in a sulk.
User avatar
By Yudster
#481558
chrysostom wrote:I tried to find some Squash related humour to alleviate this, it's just not out there.


It is, you just need to know where to look! Thanks for the thought though, much appreciated.

Nicola_Red wrote:I know. I was happy I had someone nice to talk to, and before I knew it had become an argument about paedophilia...


I know what you mean, but you do seem to have a requirement that everyone's "humour" has to fall in line with your requirements, or you'll start posting lectures. I get why, and I agree with your views on this, but we all know Badger is a bit sick in the head, and also that he doesn't mean it. It wouldn't kill you to let it go every now and then.

I am including the following to indicate that this is not intended as a dig or a snarky comment - :)
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#481561
I don't think I posted a lecture. I just said I'd rather not be called that, even in jest.

ETA: admittedly I also mentioned that I'd banned someone on another board, but I didn't mean that I was thinking of banning Badger. I forgot about that. Very busy today.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#481562
And this argument will never, ever be sorted. Its all about points of view, and we as a collective all have differeing ones. What offends Badger, doesn't offend Nic, but also vice versa.

This is the interenet and this is a public forum, by a matter of averages sometimes content from here will offend. Its how we manage this that counts. Yes, I'll agree maybe a slightly unnecessarry strop-off (I'd read no offence into Nic's response), but as Deadly has pointed out, t'was well within the remit of what we know, and love, about our Badger.

**offers round the 'pipe of peace'**
User avatar
By chrysostom
#481569
Deadly wrote:Can't we move on to casual racism?


That's my subject to get overly sensitive about and start posting lectures about.

*gets militant ethnic glasses out*

It's been a while, old friend. It's been a while.
User avatar
By chrysostom
#481571
Also Yuds - I did some reading, and it turns out that Celebrations (and Mars) made their decision to abolish the Galaxy Truffle based on 'consumer feedback', so a social media campaign might be enough to push them into including them again :D
User avatar
By Yudster
#481576
chrysostom wrote:Also Yuds - I did some reading, and it turns out that Celebrations (and Mars) made their decision to abolish the Galaxy Truffle based on 'consumer feedback', so a social media campaign might be enough to push them into including them again :D


Ah well Never mind, it was Dave who was getting all righteously indignant about it really, not so much me!
  • 1
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 498
  • 632