Chris nominated for Sony Award - chrismoyles.net forum

Reply

Chris nominated for Sony Award#224065

By michael200 - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:03 pm #224065

But once again did not make the cut for the breakfast show catagory.

Good Luck though

come on !!!!!!!

#224067

By matt_32510 - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:11 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:11 pm #224067

what did he get voted for then.

#224068

By oliver - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:16 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:16 pm #224068

are they on TV the awards?

#224069

By Adam - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:18 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:18 pm #224069

The Entertainment Award.

Nom. are:

Chris Evans - Radio 2,
Chris Moyles - Radio 1, who is yet to win Sony Gold,
Danny Baker - BBC London 94.9,
Radio 2’s Jonathan Ross
Ugly Phil - Kerrang! 105.2 West Midlands.

#224070

By Adam - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:18 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:18 pm #224070

oliver wrote:are they on TV the awards?

no.

#224072

By MC - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:21 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:21 pm #224072

No, Oliver. There is a live webcast though.

The news is on the homepage. Moyles is up for The Entertainment Award, against Chris Evans and Jonathan Ross (Radio 2), Danny Baker (BBC London 94.9) and The Ugly Phil Breakfast Show (Kerrang 105.2 West Midlands).

Full List Of Nominees:
http://www.radioawards.org

Radio 1 is up for ten in total: UK Station Of The Year, Imaging, Community Award (The Sex Tour), Comedy (oneclick/comedy), then Zane has 2 nominations, Mills has 2, Westwood one and Moyles one.

#224073

By Adam - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:25 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:25 pm #224073

Wes at Breakfast - Galaxy Manchester is a nominee for THE BREAKFAST SHOW AWARD

Wes?!?#224074

By DJPhil - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:26 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:26 pm #224074

I can't believe moyles didn't get voted into the brekkie category, but talentless wes butters did. bonkers

Very Irregular poster. Long time lurker!

#224075

By MC - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:27 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:27 pm #224075

Unbelievable.

Toolan is up too for that which is a farce. That will annoy Chris.

#224076

By oliver - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:28 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:28 pm #224076

I would of liked to watch it

#224078

By MC - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:36 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:36 pm #224078

YOU CAN

MC wrote:There is a live webcast though..

#224081

By Quincy - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:43 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:43 pm #224081

how on earth is moyles not nominated for breakfast?

toolan hahah you think then you see BUTTERS!!! WTF!! the today programme for me.

also richard park ha ha

#224084

By Quincy - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:49 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:49 pm #224084

also i quite like simon james and hill.

sorry

#224086

By oliver - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:51 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:51 pm #224086

whats a webcast? sorry to be annoying

#224087

By Console - Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:51 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:51 pm #224087

A webcast is something that is broadcast via the web.

#224095

By oliver - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:19 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:19 pm #224095

so you can watch it in something like winamp or realplayer?

#224096

By Sidders - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:19 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:19 pm #224096

Then what is a podcast? Something that is broadcast through an iPod?

#224101

By Jelly Babe - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:23 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:23 pm #224101

OMFG!

#224113

By Console - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:31 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:31 pm #224113

|S| wrote:Then what is a podcast? Something that is broadcast through an iPod?

No, it's simple a combination of the words iPod and Broadcast, like webcast is a combination of Web and Broadcast.

#224121

By Sidders - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:38 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:38 pm #224121

The word podcast is misleading, a podcast is merely an MP3 file sitting on a server somewhere. There is no broadcasting involved and there doesn't necessarily have to be any iPods involved.

#224131

By Console - Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:50 pm

- Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:50 pm #224131

It does seem stupid, but the reason is because 'podcasting' was made famous by the iPod, despite the fact that the technology had been around for years.