... your opinion that, by your own admission, you have no way of quantifying. Anyway that's the last I'm going to say on this other than I am not chrisjames.

Hi chrisjames, good to have you back.

Misfit wrote:Are you chrisjames?

Are you chrisjames?

Please don't do a chrisjames on us. Poor spelling, I can cope with. Misplaced full stops, not so much.

Didn't Chris say chrisjames was to be banned if he created any more new accounts? I checked cos I couldn't remember, and you are indeed correct: "voiceofreason" - You have an account which you can post from which is moderated. ...

Didn't Chris say chrisjames was to be banned if he created any more new accounts?

Really?

There's me, boaby and me without the 'the'.

Who am I forgetting?

Edit -

S'Alright. Found him.

Jizz Jokes Aint Funny

^Fun times with ChrisJames

I imagine Chrisjames has tried many times already.

I can't think of a regular poster that I would easily believe would create a thread like that. Except chrisjames maybe, but even then its not is usual style.

Yeah, positive. But as I say, they were chrisjames posts, not moylesisagod or voiceofreason.

Maybe those did. I only checked the ones by chrisjames to be fair, so maybe it was a more recent habit...

bmstinton93 wrote:I'm hosting the Brit awards next year.

... (not so) politely explain that they are a moron. Someone keeps doing it and eventually I get so tired of people complaining that I ban them (see chrisjames saga). The forum rules were dreamt up one lunchtime nearly ten years ago. They aren't supposed to be all-encompassing, and in the most part ...

James H wrote:

chrysostom wrote:More mods to lighten the load. I nominate moylesisagod.

i was actually wandering where chrisjames had got too. did nic or chris ban him???

So moylesisagod is definitely chrisjames' new account.

Title of the thread is wrong as its not going to be a daily thing or even close to daily, and there's unnecessary punctuation but it's still well meaning enough to be a decent contribution. Classic CJ.

... to do. I do it because I think other people want to read them. I now feel like I'm being told none of it is enough and, at the risk of doing a Chrisjames, I will leave the site before I allow people to dictate to me what I should and shouldn't listen to based on their idea of what loyalty means.

Yudster wrote:He's no more difficult to ignore than chrisjames was.

Chris Boyles is being silly. If anyone was listening to him and taking him seriously, it might be a problem but no-one is. He's no more difficult to ignore than chrisjames was.

Sorry if I wanna chrisjames everyone.

Fathomer wrote:Iain Smith's forum posts: search.php?author_id=8102&sr=posts

very similar to Chrisjames no?

Iain Smith's forum posts: search.php?author_id=8102&sr=posts

very similar to Chrisjames no?

chrysostom wrote:I bet you chrisjames gets a ticket.

Or at least makes a final return to claim that he has a pair of tickets and one of us can go with him.

I bet you chrisjames gets a ticket.

Or at least makes a final return to claim that he has a pair of tickets and one of us can go with him.